Skip to content Skip to navigation

Health information technology in LTC: Where do we stand?

January 11, 2012
by John F. Derr, RPh
| Reprints

In this new monthly blog, I will bring you the big picture in long-term and post-acute care (LTPAC) health information technology, and inform you on how to participate in the future—so we in long-term post-acute care can control our future, through strategic planning.

I will look at the total LTPAC picture. This includes research supplied by the Center for Aging Services Technologies and case studies documented by providers who are or have adopted a clinical technology infrastructure.

The above is a simple illustration of the providers in LTPAC, which also includes information technology, telemedicine, telehealth, imaging and other technologies that provide services to LTPAC providers. Over the years, “LTC” has become synonymous with SNFs and does not represent all of the providers. The acronym LTPAC does a much better job of representing our healthcare sector.

You will also note that the providers are silos. This is mainly due to the way the providers are being paid. A 2004 Presidential Executive Order, also supported by President Obama, stated that the U.S. Healthcare System would be interoperable and interconnected via the electronic health record (EHR). This established the Department of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under the secretary of Health and Human Services.

When dynamic, integrated, person-centric EHRs are available through an interconnected and interoperable HIT system, the silo walls will break down. An individual—through his or her physician—will receive care that is best for them and preferably at their chosen home. Accountable care organization and accountable care community models are intended to be person-centric and break down provider silos. 

For future success to occur, those person-centric EHRs must replace a provider system that is currently static and episodic. The LTPAC provider and vendor have to take this into consideration once they begin strategic planning. The provider has to determine what role they will play in providing care to an individual throughout the spectrum of care.

Lastly, I wanted to cover the groups that are directly supporting LTPAC HIT initiatives. Some providers and vendors might think after reading all of the hospital and physician information published on HITECH incentives that we in LTPAC do not have representation. This is not true. Dr. Farzad Mostashari, the national coordinator for HIT; his staff; and members of federal advisory committees all realize the value of LTPAC providers and vendors and have set up workgroups, grants and challenges to assist their involvement in HITECH activities.

Pages

Topics

John Derr

John Derr

@goldenliving

www.goldenliving.com

John Derr, RPh, currently serves as Health Information Technology Strategy consultant to Golden...