Skip to content Skip to navigation

Voices and choices

January 1, 2011
by Ingrid Johnson Serio, RN, BSN, MPP
| Reprints

Several years ago, while attending a meeting of a local woman's club, the oldest in the group, who was nearly 85 years old, said something very interesting: “When I visit with you girls, I forget I am so much older… until I look in the mirror. I still see with the same eyes of my youth. And in my mind's eye, I am still 30.” A few years later she succumbed to dementia. When she no longer remembered who we were, she still envisioned herself as that vibrant and educated 30-year-old woman with her own unique thoughts and opinions. Getting old and sick may have caused her to forget many things, but she didn't forget who

she was.

Ingrid Johnson Serio, RN, BSN, MPP
Ingrid Johnson Serio, RN, BSN, MPP


The Institute of Medicine issued a report in 2001 proposing recommended performance expectations for the 21st century healthcare system. The report called for fundamental changes in healthcare delivery and advised a stronger focus on patient-centered care, with the stipulation of providing long-term care residents a stronger voice in that care. Considering the demographic implications of the aging population, with some estimates anticipating the number of older adults in the United States nearly doubling between 2005 and 2030, this recommendation is not only appropriate, but also baffling. Why wasn't it recommended earlier? Providing some level of choice in how we are all treated in any environment should be a basic tenet to civilization. Expecting to have a voice in healthcare is crucial.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has responded to the recommendations in their recently launched MDS 3.0. The updated reporting system requires a direct resident interview with “all residents able to be understood at least some of the time.” This requirement replaces staff observations regarding customary routines and activities. Families may serve as the proxy if the resident cannot participate in the interview.

The American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordination (AANAC) listserv has been lit up with complaints from providers regarding the patient interview provision since the October 1, 2010 launch of MDS 3.0. Dr. Debra Saliba, MD, MPH, director of the UCLA Borun Center for Gerontological Research at the Jewish Home for the Aging, reported at the fall 2010 AANAC conference in Baltimore that she has heard a variety of concerns regarding the interview of residents. Her examples included: “I can't do this. I can't go in and ask these questions.” “This isn't in my scope of practice.” “What if they cry?” “You haven't been to my nursing home. My residents are too impaired to answer.” Prior to launching the new MDS 3.0, a national test of 4,500 residents was completed. The test measured safety and resident voice items, which included accuracy (reliability and validity), staff satisfaction and perceived utility, time to complete, and feasibility (ability to complete). The interviews assess cognition, mood, preferences for customary routines and activities, and pain.

The American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordination (AANAC) is a nonprofit professional association representing nurse executives working in the long-term care profession. AANAC is operated by nurses for nurses and is dedicated to providing members with the resources, tools, and support they need in their specialized role of leaders and managers in long-term care. For more information, visit www.aanac.org or call (800) 768-1880.

Dr. Saliba reported that the nurses completing the MDS 3.0 testing rated it vastly improved over MDS 2.0. Eighty-five percent of respondents rated MDS 3.0 as likely to help identify unrecognized problems. Eighty-nine percent rated MDS 3.0 as providing a more accurate report of resident characteristics than MDS 2.0, and 84% reported that MDS 3.0 interview items improved their knowledge of residents. The average time reported for completing all interviews was 17 minutes.

Once the testing was completed, a follow-up evaluation was performed to test the results of the new MDS process. Staff responses to the interview process drastically transformed: “This new MDS reminds me of why I became a nurse.” “You know, it's the most amazing thing. Residents really don't mind being asked and you really learn a lot.” “I thought it would take a lot of time and that you were crazy. I was wrong: It saved me time.” “Even if their memory isn't great, they were able to answer.” “We didn't know how much he was suffering.”

The resident interview also replaces staff observations for residents who can report pain symptoms. According to Dr. Saliba, the pain interview questions provide a fuller picture of pain from the resident perspective and are more likely to lead to increased pain detection. Additionally, utilizing improved scales and inference items gives a more clinically meaningful picture and allows healthcare providers to better recognize the commonly used pain scales. It is the expectation that providers will improve pain management skills, resulting in a better quality of life for residents.

Additionally, utilizing improved scales and inference items gives a more clinically meaningful picture and allows healthcare providers to better recognize the commonly used pain scales. It is the expectation that providers will improve pain management skills, resulting in a better quality of life for residents.

Pages

Topics